Surveys are a valuable tool for collecting data about people’s opinions, attitudes, and behaviors. So, naturally, you would want to get accurate and meaningful responses.

However, survey responses do not always accurately reflect what people really think or do. This is because different people respond to questions differently. For example, some people will always agree or disagree with any statement, while others will always stay in the middle.

If you don’t factor in response styles, you risk making inaccurate assumptions and or missing out on important insights into respondents’ behaviors and preferences. Let’s explore the types of survey response styles and how they affect your survey.

Understanding Survey Response Styles

Survey styles are patterns of how respondents react to survey questions, regardless of the question. These patterns can lead to bias in the survey results, making it hard to interpret and draw conclusions from survey data.

Types of Response Styles

  • Acquiescence bias: the inclination to agree with all of the questions, regardless of the topic.
  • Extreme response bias: the tendency to give extreme ratings, either strongly positive or negative responses.
  • Social desirability bias: respondents’ tendency to answer in a way that conforms to cultural norms and allows them to fit in.

Psychological Factors That Contribute to Response Styles

Psychological factors like personality, culture, cognition, and mood play a significant role in how people respond. For example, people who tend to be more agreeable,  conscientious, or optimistic are more prone to acquiescence bias.

People with a high level of uncertainty avoidance, power distance, or individualism may be more susceptible to extreme response bias. While respondents with strong self-monitoring, impression management, or need for approval may be more susceptible to social desirability bias.

Common Types of Survey Response Styles

This is when people agree or say “yes” irrespective of the question and its context. It can happen for a variety of reasons, like wanting to please the survey administrator, avoiding conflict or ambiguity, or simply not being motivated or interested in the survey topic.

For example, if you ask respondents if they like or dislike some popular TV shows, the respondents prone to acquiescence bias may like all or most of them even if they haven’t watched them or don’t like them.

This is when people tend to pick extreme answers, like “excellent” or “extremely bad,” instead of moderate answers like “good” or “bad”. This is usually because respondents have strong opinions or feelings about the survey, have cultural differences in how they answer, or don’t understand the scope or purpose of the question.

For example, if you ask people how satisfied they are with their job on a scale of 1 to 10, some people might pick 1 or 10, but their actual satisfaction level is somewhere in between.

  • Social Desirability Bias

Respondents may also provide socially desirable answers rather than accurate ones to portray themselves favorably, avoid criticism, or conform to societal norms. This is especially common when sensitive questions are asked, there is a lack of anonymity, or there is perceived pressure from the researcher or society.

For example, when you ask respondents their political views (e.g., whether they favor or disagree with a particular policy or candidate), some respondents may respond in line with the majority view or the expected response, even though they disagree with it or don’t have an opinion on it.

Implications of Survey Response Styles

1. Inflated Survey Results and Inaccurate Data Analysis

Acquiescence bias and extreme response bias can both have an impact on the average score. 

Acquiescence bias causes an average score that is higher than the expected value, while extreme response bias produces a score that is lower than expected. This can make it difficult to interpret the data and draw accurate conclusions

2. Introduces Bias

Social desirability bias can lead people to overstate their positive opinions and understate their negative opinion. This can skew the survey results and make it hard to get a good picture of the people in the study.

3. Distortion of Findings and Effects on Validity

Let’s say you create a survey to see how satisfied people are with your product, but respondents tend to say they’re happy with it, even when they are not or indifferent, the survey results won’t be accurate. This can lead to poor decision-making and resource allocation.

Read – Internal Validity in Research: Definition, Threats, Examples

4. Consequences of Unaddressed Response Styles

Response styles can have significant consequences for decision-making, policy formation, and resource allocation if they are not addressed. 

For example, if a government survey is used to assess the level of need for a new social program, but the survey results are skewed because of response styles, the government may make judgments that are not in the best interests of the people.

Mitigating Survey Response Styles

  • Question-Wording

The question wording is one of the most crucial things to consider when designing a survey. It’s important to make sure the questions are clear, short, and neutral so respondents don’t feel compelled to pick a particular answer or get confused.

Avoid jargon, technical terms, and double-barreled words with different meanings to different people. Also, avoid using double negatives, and don’t multiple questions about the same issue in one question.

Related – Questionnaire Design: 10 Questioning Mistakes to Avoid

  • Response Scale

Your response scale should have clear instructions on how to use it, for example, if respondents can select one or more options, or how to rank their preference. It should also be appropriate for the type and level of measurement of the variable being measured.

Also, avoid using labels that are too extreme or vague, such as “always” or “never”, or “good” or “bad”.  Your response scale should be balanced- have an equal number of positive and negative options as well as a neutral option.

  • Randomize Response Formats and Question Order

Randomized response formats are methods that allow respondents to answer sensitive or personal questions without revealing their true answers to the researcher. 

You can also randomize question order to reduce order effects, such as primacy or recency effects, which are the tendencies of respondents to favor the first or last options presented to them. 

  • Balanced Presentation

This means presenting both sides of the argument or question honestly and impartially.  For example, asking respondents whether they support or oppose a policy can trigger response bias than asking them whether they agree or disagree with a statement about the policy.

  • Create Survey Administration Protocol

Design survey guidelines that explain the survey purpose and objectives, its duration, how to complete the survey, and how to get in touch with the researcher if there are any questions or concerns.

Also, emphasize that there are no right or wrong answers and that respondents should answer honestly and based on their own opinions and experiences.

Analytical Considerations and Interpretation of Survey Results

Response styles can increase data variance, distort survey results, and reduce data reliability. This makes it less likely that the results will be consistent across different samples.

Here’s how to interpret and adjust survey results to factor in any potential biases:

  • Carefully Evaluate the Research Question

First, think about what kind of research you’re doing and what kind of data you’re looking at. If you’re dealing with a research question that’s prone to different response styles, make sure you’re doing everything you can to mitigate its effects.

  • Use Multiple Question Types

Using different question types makes it less likely that people will stick to a particular response style. For example, using Likert scales and open-ended questions allows you to understand the reasons behind responses.

  • Survey Pre-testing

Instead of launching the survey directly to your target population, test the survey with a small sample first to see if there are any issues with the survey design. That way, you can make sure that the questions aren’t vague or confusing, and that they’re not prone to response styles.

Read Also – Pilot Survey: Definition, Importance + [Question Examples]

  • Validation Techniques and Sensitivity Analysis

Validation techniques assess the accuracy of the survey tool and if there are any issues with the questions. Sensitivity analysis looks at the reliability of the results against assumptions about various types of responses.

  • Subgroup Analyses and Demographic Comparisons

Use subgroup analysis to see if there are any differences in response styles across different demographic groups.

Future Directions and Advanced Techniques

Survey research is constantly evolving, so it’s important to keep learning and working together to make survey design and analysis methods better. This is important because response styles can have a significant impact on the accuracy of survey results. 

Staying current on research and developing new methods ensure survey data is accurate and reliable. Here are some advanced techniques for mitigating response styles in surveys:

  • Machine Learning Algorithms

You can use machine learning to train algorithms on previous survey data to identify patterns related to acquiescence bias. The algorithm could also point out which respondents are most likely to use this response style.

  • Natural Language Processing

NLP techniques help you to analyze the text of survey responses for signs of extreme language or inconsistent statements. This could help to identify respondents who are using extreme response bias or social desirability bias.

  • Sentiment Analysis

You can also use sentiment analysis to understand the tone of the survey responses and respondents’ emotions. For example, you could see if people are responding with anger or fear.

Conclusion

Surveys are prone to different response styles, and the biases that come with them. Understanding and mitigating survey response styles can help you design better surveys and interpret your data more accurately. 


  • Moradeke Owa
  • on 7 min read

Formplus

You may also like:

Recency effect In Surveys: Meaning, Causes, Effects & Mitigation

Introduction The recency effect is a phenomenon in which individuals tend to remember and prioritize information that they have...


7 min read
Response Burden in Surveys: Implications & Alleviation

Introduction When it comes to surveys, gathering valuable data is crucial for making informed decisions and understanding various...


6 min read
The Bandwagon Effect: Meaning & Implications For Online Polling

Cognitive biases are not inherently bad; they help us make split-second decisions by leveraging the opinions of others, but they are...


8 min read
Inattentional Blindness in Surveys: Causes, Effects Examples & Mitigation

Introduction Inattentional blindness is a cognitive phenomenon in which an individual fails to perceive a visible object or event...


10 min read

Formplus - For Seamless Data Collection

Collect data the right way with a versatile data collection tool. Try Formplus and transform your work productivity today.
Try Formplus For Free