Remember how most polls predicted Hillary Clinton would win the presidential elections in 2016, or how over 200,000 people supposedly preferred Coca-Cola’s “New Coke” to the original. Both cases proved disastrous because the polls failed to capture true public sentiment, leading to gross disappointment and huge losses.
Polls help you understand what people think about products, candidates, policies, subscriptions, etc. — if done right. However, misinterpreting poll results based on your bias or inexperience can cost you everything. In this guide, we’ll look at how to ensure your poll interpretations are always spot on.
The goal of creating polls is to measure people’s opinions and use this data to make informed decisions. Here’s how understanding polls helps you make better decisions:
Polls provide the information you need to adjust your strategy or make decisions. For example, for product development, opinion polls help you understand how users feel about your current products and features, determining your roadmap.
Also, in politics, polls help you measure public opinion about your candidates and recalibrate your campaign strategy to ensure your candidate reflects the values and opinions their constituents want from them.
The major reasons for flawed interpretation are biased sampling, poor survey design, and overlooking margins of error. There are severe consequences to misinterpreting poll data, including product, campaign, policy, or business failure. For example, Coca-Cola thought New Coke would work because 200,000 random testers claimed to like it better than the original. But Coca-Cola didn’t take into account customers’ loyalty and resonance with the original Coke, so they misinterpreted the results, leading to a product rejection so severe, the company pulled the product after just 79 days.
The information you get when you analyze polls correctly helps you refine marketing strategies, product development, policy, or campaign tactics. For example, as a marketer, polls can help you segment your target audience and personalize your campaign to fit their needs and get better conversions.
Here are some best practices to ensure you collect and interpret poll results accurately:
Poll results are snapshots, not prophecies. A 10% lead today could vanish tomorrow. Always:
A biased sample is a very big problem in polls; it could skew your data and have you think your strategy is working when it’s not. This is what happened in the Dewey vs Truman elections. Ensure your sample:
The margin of error (MoE) indicates the range where the true value likely falls (e.g., ±3% means if you are leading in the polls with 40%, your actual value is between 37% and 43%). The larger your samples, the more likely your margin of error will be reduced.
So, always give room for uncertainty; it helps you prepare for difficult situations and offers a fresh perspective on your data.
Here are some questions to help you decide whether or not poll results are valid and reliable:
There are big and small poll companies, so size doesn’t necessarily determine the trustworthiness of pollsters. What you should look out for is their transparency, historical poll data, and their associations.
The first step is to use a reputable pollster with decades of experience creating polls and collecting unbiased results. Next, ensure your pollster isn’t tied to any group with an agenda that could cause bias. Finally, check your pollster’s transparency policy; how willing are they to disclose their methodology and funding sources?
Even if your survey design is good, you may still collect biased data if your sampling isn’t done right. For example, if your sample size is too small, you are more likely to have a high margin of error. Also, if your sample isn’t diverse enough to accurately represent your target population, your poll may not reflect the true opinion of the people. You should also check for weighting adjustments—if the pollsters correct for overrepresented or underrepresented groups?
Look through the poll questions to ensure the polls aren’t structured to elicit specific responses. For example, a poll question of “Do you support the reckless policy of Congressman Yellow?” is a push poll designed to push a narrative and not collect actual opinions.
Another thing you should look to verify is whether the question order is primed to lead respondents to an opinion. If the poll uses any of these tactics to collect data, they are very likely that not reflect the true opinion of the people.
Poll results change with time and events. For example, if the poll shows a candidate is leading before a scandal, the poll result is most likely to shift after the scandal. Sometimes, it doesn’t even have to be something dramatic for opinions to change; time just passes, and people forget.
So, ensure the poll results aren’t one-off; it’s better to use results from a consistent trend than a one-off poll.
Here are some tips to help you interpret poll results better:
Polling numbers are hardly ever constant; people’s opinions shift with events and time. So, you need to look at long-term patterns rather than single data points. For example, if you are running a political campaign, you can track moving averages for over 7 to 30 days to see how people view your candidates and how their perceptions change. This can provide insights into how well your campaign strategy is working.
Also, if you had any major event, for example, a debate, scandal, or policy changes, looking at the polling data trend helps you see the inflection point and properly plan your crisis management.
Pool results are never 100% reliable—there’s always a margin of error. To ensure accuracy, you should seek a second, third, or even fourth opinion by comparing polls. This helps identify similar trends, spot flawed results, and refine your interpretation.
If multiple polls share similar trends, confidence in the results increases, meaning they’re likely accurate and reliable. However, if one poll shows an outlier result, it could indicate either a bias in the other polls or an error in that particular poll (this is more likely).
Sample size matters in determining the margin of error. For example, a margin of error below 5% with a small or medium sample size may not show significant differences in your poll. However, you must also be cautious—while a large sample size is generally good, overrepresentation can skew results and lead to misinterpretation.
Use a reliable method like probability (p-values) to determine the statistical significance of errors.
You can’t interpret poll results in isolation—you must compare them with other data sources. For example, if you’re running an election poll to gauge campaign performance, cross-reference it with election forecasts, event attendance, voter registration trends, and other relevant metrics.
Also, consider historical comparisons, did similar polls in past elections accurately predict outcomes, or were they misinterpretations or temporary fluctuations?
Start by assessing who conducted the poll. Was it an independent organization or one with a vested interest? For example, a poll conducted by a company advocating for change in a particular area is more likely to be biased when reporting results about this particular topic.
You should also examine the historical accuracy of the pollster. Have their past polls been reliable, or do they have a track record of misinterpretation? Also, scrutinize their methodology—did they use online surveys, phone interviews, or in-person sampling? Each method carries potential biases that could skew results.
Another key factor is opinion shifts after major events. For example, if a company announces a major product release with industry endorsements, poll respondents may express temporary enthusiasm, not necessarily genuine brand loyalty.
Several external factors can distort poll responses:
Visualization tools (e.g., RealClearPolitics, interactive charts) can help compare multiple polls and identify trends. If you conducted the poll yourself, track changes in opinion or support over time.
To interpret polls accurately, avoid these mistakes:
Mistake |
Consequence |
Smart Alternative |
Small sample sizes |
High MoE, unreliable results |
Use power analysis to determine the recommended minimum sample size |
Ignoring demographics |
Misses crucial subgroup differences |
Ensure diversity in your demographics by setting quotas for age, gender, income, etc. |
Overreacting to outliers |
Chasing statistical ghosts |
Wait for 2-3 polls showing the same trend |
Misreading volatility | Confusing noise for signal |
Focus on consistent trends, not daily swings |
Other Pro Tips for Actionable Insights:
Before you can interpret poll results like a pro, you need a healthy amount of skepticism about all results and the patience to distinguish trends from anomalies. It’s not just about checking percentages in your favour, you have to thoroughly investigate the numbers.
We hope this guide helps you better interpret polls and spot flawed interpretations. You can also check out our guide on push polls and how to spot them.
You may also like:
Imagine scrolling through the internet and you see data depicted with a graph stating that 90% percent of adults love this new product....
How do you persuade others to adopt your viewpoint? Throughout history, people have swayed friends, families, and even armies to...
Have you noticed some changes in your employees’ performance, professional disposition, and overall attitude to work? Then, you need to...
Every student knows how important it is to do well in school and have good grades but do all students get good grades? The answer is no....