The first thing that comes to mind when you hear the term “deliberation” is a panel debating critical issues. In a deliberative poll, a random sample of citizens is surveyed on a particular issue before and after they have been allowed to deliberate about the issue.
The purpose of deliberative polling is to inform and shape public opinion on complex topics such as immigration, health care, climate change, or resource management.
Let’s take a look at deliberative polling, its importance, and a step-by-step guide on how to run a successful deliberative poll from start to finish.
Deliberative polling was developed by James S. Fishkin in the 1980s. Fishkin, a political scientist, was worried about how civic engagement was declining and how uninformed public opinion was becoming. He designed deliberate polling believing it would give people the chance to understand and reflect on important topics.
One of the first adoption of deliberative polls was in 1996 when the UK held a televised deliberative poll about crime.
The main objective of deliberative polls is to demystify complex topics that affect the public. It also helps to identify areas of consensus and disagreement on these topics.
Policymakers also use deliberate polling to generate recommendations for policy modification. So, what are the best practices for deliberative polling?
The major difference between deliberative and traditional polling is knowledge. Deliberative polling allows respondents to learn more about the topic being polled through conversations with the moderator and other participants. This is different from traditional surveys, which simply ask respondents what they think about the topic.
Deliberative polling is done before and after the deliberation to measure the impact of the deliberation on people’s opinions. However, traditional polls are a one-time study.
1. Random Selection and Representativeness of Participants
The first step in a deliberative poll is to select a random sample of citizens to take the survey. The sample should be representative in terms of demographics (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender, education level, etc.). This ensures that the results of your poll are accurate and representative of public opinion.
2. Pre-polling Phase: Gathering Baseline Opinions and Knowledge
After choosing the participants, poll them about the topic. The pre-poll gives you a general idea of how people feel about the topic. It also helps you determine where people may be underinformed or misinformed.
3. Deliberation Phase: Facilitating Informed Discussions
This is where participants learn about the topic from experts and have peer-to-peer discussions. Also, make sure the deliberation is handled by professionally trained moderators who will ensure respectful and constructive discussion.
4. Post-polling Phase: Measuring Shifts in Opinions and Attitudes
After the deliberation phase, poll participants again on their opinions and knowledge about the issue. This post-poll allows you to measure the impact of the deliberation on public opinion. It also allows helps you to identify areas where participants’ opinions shifted or the new information they acquired from the session.
Deliberative polling allows citizens to learn about complex issues and discuss the significance of these issues with one another. This allows people to gain a better comprehension of the issues, consider different points of view, and make better-informed decisions.
Deliberative polling involves citizens in the decision-making process, making them more likely to respond to future civic engagement because they know their opinions matter.
Deliberative polls enable citizens to hear and interact with different perspectives on a particular topic. This helps people understand why people have different opinions and are willing to compromise to find common ground.
The discussion from participants of different backgrounds during the deliberation allows people to see different perspectives on the topic and challenge their biases.
Deliberative polling is not always representative of the target population. A major reason for this is that participants are often selected from a pool of volunteers, who may not be representative of the general population.
Also, if your moderator or participants are already biased about the topic, other participants could end up being misinformed.
Read More – Research Bias: Definition, Types + Examples
Deliberative polls usually involve a mix of people with different levels of experience and knowledge about the topic being polled. This makes it harder for people to have good conversations or chip in their perspective because experts tend to dominate the conversation.
Deliberative polling can be a costly and time-consuming process, it requires recruiting participants, providing them with information, and facilitating the deliberation process. The poll is also a cyclic process; it has to be done repeatedly, which can make it difficult to schedule.
The poll after the deliberation may not adequately reflect the effect of deliberation on individual participants and the public. Participants may choose different answers than what they earlier picked because of several biases- social desirability bias, bandwagon effect, and others.
1. Case Studies of Successful Deliberative Polling Projects
In the United Kingdom, a deliberative poll on electoral reform was conducted in 2009. The results showed that a majority of voters supported a proportional representation electoral system for the UK parliament.
Another example of a well-executed deliberative poll is Ireland’s Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. The assembly was held in 2016 and found a clear majority in favor of a new single transferable vote (STV) electoral system for Ireland’s Dáil.
2. Examples of How Deliberative Polling Influenced Policy-Making
3. Global Adoption and Expansion of Deliberative Polling Initiatives
Deliberative polls have been adopted and developed in many countries worldwide. For example, in Europe, they have been used to investigate questions about climate change, migration, and the European Union.
Also, in Asia, they’ve been used to investigate nuclear power, health care, and education issues. In African countries like Uganda, Kenya, Ghana, and Malawi, deliberative polls were used for risk management, investigating corruption, and other important issues.
Potential Advancements and Adaptations
Streamlining the deliberation process– Instead of manually sampling participants to ensure they are representative of the population, you can use technology to recruit and communicate with participants.
For example, you can set a limit on how many people from a certain demographic you want on the poll to participate to ensure inclusivity. You can also host your deliberation on a teleconferencing platform, so you don’t have to worry about venues, reducing costs.
Cultural and Contextual Adaptation– A major upside to deliberative polling is that it allows participants and researchers to explore topics that are particular to specific communities. It also allows you to see different perspectives on the issue depending on context or culture.
Integration with other forms of public participation– You can integrate deliberative polls with other types of public engagement, such as citizen juries or consensus conferences. This is a way more cost-effective way of reaching a wide audience without sampling bias.
Integration of Technology and Online Platforms
You can integrate deliberative polling with online platforms, allowing participants to discuss the topic in real-time, regardless of their location. It also provides participants with virtual access to research and data from experts and other participants.
Exploring New Contexts and Issues for Deliberative Polling
Deliberative polling is a valuable tool for improving democracy. It can help citizens to make informed decisions, actively engage in civic life, and build a more just and equitable society.
However, like most research methods, deliberative polling has its challenges and limitations. Ensure you mitigate potential biases to get accurate and reliable results.
You may also like:
Introduction Survey straight lining occurs when the respondents of a survey in haste, select the same response every time....
Introduction Judgment sampling is a type of non-random sampling method used in survey research and data collection. It is a method in...
Introduction Survey biases can occur in any survey, but they are more likely to occur when the survey is conducted by humans. Humans are...
If you are looking for a way to conduct a research study while optimizing your resources, desk research is a great option. Desk research...